Dangerous dogs linked to criminal owners
A study by the SPCA, the University of Cincinnati and Children's Hospital of 335 dog owners in the state of Ohio produced some intriguing, but not unexpected, conclusions.
According to Jaclyn Barnes of the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Centre, “Owners of vicious dogs who have been cited for failing to register a dog (or) failing to keep a dog confined on the premises ... are more than
9 times more likely to have been convicted for a crime involving children,
3 times more likely to have been convicted of domestic violence,
14 times more likely to have an alcohol related conviction.... and nearly
8 times more likely to be charged with drug crimes than owners of low-risk licensed dogs.”
High risk dogs were defined as “those which have killed or caused serious injuries” and, unfortunately, all ”pit bulls,” which by Ohio law are automatically considered vicious.
The breeds deemed to be at the lowest risk of causing injury in the study included Poodles, Collies, Terriers, and Beagles.
So what the study really says is that the dregs of society who breed and buy dogs to protect methamphetamine labs are not concerned with social behavior for themselves or for their dogs. A scumbag convicted of abuse of children and domestic partners may be more drawn to an attack dog than to Poodles or Beagles.
Punishing innocent dogs and responsible dog owners by legislating against particular breeds is not the answer to the problem. Criminals will just find new breeds to corrupt.
More from WKRC TV


Of all the dogs I've owned during my lifetime, the two dogs that would bite people (including members of my family and myself) were a terrier (wire-haired fox) and a basset hound. The terrier was simply high strung but not mean. The basset was mean which is atypical to the breed.
It's my own experience that there are dogs out there that are just plain mean. It has nothing to do with the breed but some genetic quirk that makes them that way. Then there are the dogs that people make mean. Again, it's not the breed but the people (owners).
The findings of this study don't surprise me.
Posted by: Laura | November 29, 2006 at 05:11 PM
Yes! If you don't mind, I'm going to provide a link to this post in my blog post tonight.
You've summed it up beautifully. With this last bit "Punishing innocent dogs and responsible dog owners by legislating against particular breeds is not the answer to the problem. Criminals will just find new breeds to corrupt."
Posted by: Faith | November 29, 2006 at 07:05 PM
Our neighbors use to have a beagle that was kept on a rope and all the kids teased him, he got very mean, people can make dogs mean, bad people will always find mean dogs.
Posted by: Sara | November 29, 2006 at 07:24 PM
Breed specific legislation for pit bulls, rottweilers and german shepards is racial profiling for dogs. It is so unfair. Where will it stop?
Posted by: Carrie | November 29, 2006 at 09:20 PM
I hate it because it's like these dogs are being punished twice - once for their owners and then for what their owners have done to them.
Today I took my pit to the vet for her check-up. She was so happy to be there (sometimes I think she's smart - sometimes - not so smart...that vet has prodded and stabbed her numerous times) and was wagging her tail vigorously at all the dogs and people and everyone was smiling back and talked about what a pretty dog she was. Given half a chance, pits could really find their way into more good owner's hearts. Like any dog, they aren't for everyone but I have hopes for more happy homes.
Meanwhile - I saw a reality show on the Gottis where the thug-wannabe son had adopted three Rottweilers. When the trainer came she asked what he wanted his dogs to learn. He said "I want them to be vicious...."
You are so right. Great post!
Posted by: jillbryant | November 29, 2006 at 11:50 PM
I agree with Carrie's comment above. Any dog could potenially become vicious for a multitude of reasons. By singling out a handful it only encourages the ruining of other breeds. In Ontario the Pitt Bull is banned and experts are saying the new breed of choice amongst criminals will be the Cane Corso ... :(
Posted by: Sue | November 30, 2006 at 09:11 AM
Well said!
Posted by: Hope | November 30, 2006 at 10:25 AM
See, me an' Johnny gots a team of teacup poodles for hire for pit fight work, but we get 80 percent of total revenues plus a 20 percent processing fee. Rotties, pitbulls, potbellied pigs, our teacups don't lose, see? Call for details. Deposit required,see?
Posted by: The Pomfather | December 01, 2006 at 08:43 PM
Yes yes yes YES!
Also the vast number of dogs who inflict serious or fatal bites were CHAINED up at the time....
There are some STUPD people in my neighborhod with two Rottweilers (a male and a female, so the morons can make some money off puppies, UGH.) Well, guess what. They recently got a pitbull "to encourage the Rottweilers to be better watchdogs." Some people just need to become infertile and die, I'm not kidding.
Funny, I just did a sorta anti-BSL blog entry this morning, before I saw this.
Right on.
Posted by: Carina | December 02, 2006 at 04:06 AM