Recently these headlines or some variations appeared in news sources:
Man's worst friend: Average dog causes 2,000
family arguments in its lifetime
Source
Dogs cause 156 family arguments every year
Source
Dogs cause three family arguments every week
Source
Wow…dogs must be the worst thing ever to happen to family life if we are to believe these headlines.
According to a study by a UK pet insurance company, arguments range from what to do with the dog while going away, who should walk the dog, whether the dog should be allowed on the furniture, what kind of discipline should be used, how much money is spent, who should clean up the messes, and destruction caused by the dog.
Sadly, 26 per cent of these dog owners have at some point considered getting rid of their dog,
But wait…
There’s more.
Buried in some (but not all) of the stories is this sentence:
The study also revealed while the majority of family arguments are more likely to be about the children than the family pet, 14 per cent of owners reckon they row about the dog more than their children.
So--- buried in a subordinate clause near the end of some of the stories, we find that the majority of family arguments are about children, not dogs after all. Apparently 86% of the people questioned didn't think the dog was that much of a problem.
Most of the stories just omitted this fact about the study.
Ah, the ethics of professional journalists.
The only real conclusion seems to be that there are simply a lot of family arguments. But that probably wouldn't be "newsworthy."
![Validate my Atom 1.0 feed [Valid Atom 1.0]](valid-atom.png)